This should make you angry, This should make you lament. Terence Crutcher, with his hands up, surrounded by officers on the ground and in the air, shot dead.
There should be no referendum on his criminal background or whether he had one. He was unarmed with his hands up. There should be no grumbling about complete cooperation with officers' directives for stillness. He was unarmed, with his hands up. There should be no claims of justifiably because he seemed under the influence. He was unarmed. With his hands up. Terence Crutcher did not deserve to die. He did nothing to earn his death sentence. Whether Black or White, Latino or Hispanic (yes, there's a difference), Asian or African, poor or rich, whatever your gender or sexuality, no one deserves summary execution in the streets. He was UNARMED. With his HANDS UP. Stop blaming victims. Just stop. It's time to recognize that there's blatant injustice. It's time to call evil what it is. Not all cops are bad. That's not the point. The point is that, for some reason, a child of God, a brother in Christ, is dead. And already, people are out there looking for justifications rather than supporting the victim. It's time to stop victim-blaming people who are clearly victims, whose bodies have been labeled as threatening or dangerous simply because they're different than our bodies. Even when they're unarmed. With their hands up. Lord, we commend into your hands our brother, Terence Crutcher. We lament the unnecessary loss of life, and we commit him into your care. Make us bold to stand on the side of true justice. Give us courage to support all people, and especially those demonized or devalued in our culture. Remind us that #blacklivesmatter just as much as any other life. Remind us that the theology of the cross is not one of glory or power, but one of presence with those who suffer, that your promise is to liberate us from the chains of oppression and allegiance to sin. Remind us that, like Terence, you died unarmed with your hands up. When we see you in Terence, and Terence in you, maybe then we will be angry with tears for justice, with sobs for righteousness, with conviction that no one else need die unarmed with their hands up.
0 Comments
Since Colin Kaepernick chose not to stand for the national anthem less than two weeks ago, there's been much fallout. We've learned that The Star Spangled Banner actually celebrates the slaughter of freed slaves. We've learned that Kaepernick isn't alone among professional athletes who want to see change in our country. We've also learned that a bevy of veterans support Kaepernick's right to sit or stand during the anthem.
My concern here, though, is the Christian response. There's an example from Sojourners that notes the necessity of protest against injustice from a Christian perspective. Patheos connects the story to Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego in front of Nebuchadnezzar, and goes so far as to say, "if you’re telling your kids that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego did the right thing (by refusing to bow to Nebuchadnezzar's god), but Kaepernick did the wrong thing, you’re sending them mixed messages." The Christian Science Monitor even suggested that Colin may be the new face of patriotism. I found these most encouraging, that there were people of faith ready to defend Colin's constitutional and biblical grounding. Of course, there's another side, perhaps typified by an article from Charisma News. Therein the author suggested that Colin was actually being selfish, putting his team in a negative light, and suggests that Colin doesn't truly understand the problems of racism and racial profiling in our country. This seems to fit the social media outcry that I've seen from too many Christians, ridicule Colin for exercising a constitutional right in order to create a conversation around the constitutional rights of people of color across the country. Yet, what concerns me most about the response from Christians is the assumption that we owe absolute allegiance to a flag or a country. In 2nd Corinthians, Paul reminds us that Christians are Christ's ambassadors to the places in which we live. And let's not forget: ambassadors are not citizens of the country where they live. Their citizenship belongs to their country of origin and to the ruler who sent them. Christians are citizens of God's kingdom first, and our allegiance is not first to a flag, or a song, or a constitution, but to the God made known in Christ. Now, this doesn't mean we're supposed to hate the countries in which we live; far from it! Max Lucado once wrote, “God loves you just the way you are, but God refuses to leave you that way. God wants you to be just like Jesus.” This, it seems, should be our outlook as God's ambassadors. We should love our countries, but in a way that seeks their transformation. There is no perfect country, so of course we must at times protest, we must at times work to change our constitution, in order to pursue further justice. Or, in the words of 2nd Corinthians, to negotiate with the world so that it might reconcile with God. I can't pretend to know the inner workings of Colin's faith or mind. What I can say, though, is that as people of faith, we too must be ready at times to not salute everything that our country does. Blind allegiance is not an allegiance worth offering. When our country incarcerates 2.2 million people, 500,000 more than China, a country four times our size, we should not salute that. When it's less likely for people with "black-sounding names" to be hired for jobs or responded to by their government, we should not salute that. When people of color are more likely to experience violence at the hands of our government officials, we should not salute that. Instead, as Christ's ambassadors, we should be pointing to God's preference for those who are imprisoned, for those who are ostracized, for those who experience injustice, and work to bring change that reflects God's reconciliation of all things in Christ Jesus. |
AuthorSimultaneously a sinner and a saint. Archives
September 2020
Categories |